|
With
the alarming increase of drugs and weapons on American School
Campuses, teachers, administrators, and school officials
have stepped up their efforts to search school property,
student possessions, and sometimes, student themselves.
This trend has led to regular challenging state cases and
a few; notably, the U. S. Supreme Court settled the 1985
landmark case, New Jersey vs. T.L.O..
The
courts primarily focus on protection of students constitutional
rights, yet schools have been granted greater leeway in
conducting searchers than police officers. Law enforcement
officers must have a search warrant and meet a probable
cause standard to conduct a search. The
4th Amendment of the U. S. Constitution set forth
two requirements in response to protecting citizens against
unlawful and unreasonable searches.
School
officials, however, have successfully demonstrated to the
courts that such stringent requirements would seriously
impair the ability to maintain disciplined and a safe school
environment. With this in mind, school officials are not
required to obtain a warrant, but a required to meet the
reasonable suspicion standard. School officials
must remember: - any search of a student creates a 4th Amendment
issue.
Student
searches in American Samoa are also obligated to meet the
reasonable suspicion standard in response to
the 4th Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. Each new case
poses its own particular scenario of events. Currently,
there is no formula for determining that a search is reasonable;
each case has different facts and circumstances. The following
guideline points out specific factors to consider.
|